Implicature of Saputri’s Stand Up Comedy on Kompas TV

Authors

  • Berkania Feronika Sajang English Education Study Program, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Manado, Tondano 95618, Indonesia
  • Alloysius Rettob English Education Study Program, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Manado, Tondano 95618, Indonesia
  • Jenie Posumah English Education Study Program, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Manado, Tondano 95618, Indonesia

Keywords:

Conventional Implicature, Pragmatics, Stand Up Comedy, Humor, Saputri, Social Criticism

Abstract

This study investigates conventional implicature in Saputri’s stand-up comedy performance “Unfinished Work” Part 5 on Kompas TV on 23 October 2019. The study aims to identify the conventional implicatures expressed in Saputri’s utterances and explain their meanings in relation to humor, criticism, satire, and social evaluation. A qualitative descriptive design was employed. The data were obtained through documentation of the YouTube recording, followed by repeated viewing, transcription, selection, categorization, and interpretation of relevant utterances. Data analysis involved data reduction, data display, interpretation, and conclusion drawing. The analysis examined the relationship between linguistic expressions, contextual information, and implied meanings based on Grice’s theory of implicature. The findings identified eleven utterances containing conventional implicatures. These utterances demonstrate that Saputri used indirect expressions, teasing, irony, exaggeration, wordplay, and contextual references to construct humorous meanings while communicating social messages. The implicatures addressed several issues, including multiple ministerial positions, corruption, inappropriate online content, workplace behavior, the influence of personal connections in employment, public figures’ appearances and personalities, and perceptions of professional competence. The findings indicate that Saputri’s humor functions beyond entertainment because it enables criticism and social evaluation to be communicated indirectly without relying exclusively on explicit statements. The study concludes that conventional implicature is an effective pragmatic strategy in stand-up comedy for creating humorous effects and conveying critical messages. This research contributes to pragmatic studies of humor by highlighting how Indonesian stand-up comedy can serve as a medium for indirect criticism and social commentary.

References

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051

Belyaev, D. (2022). Pragmatics of humor in foreign language teaching (German/Russian). Aspects of linguistics and didactics: Conversational implicatures, “complicatures” and skills. Revista Lengua y Cultura, 4(7), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.29057/lc.v4i7.9641

Bernad-Mechó, E., & Girón-García, C. (2023). A multimodal analysis of humour as an engagement strategy in YouTube research dissemination videos. The European Journal of Humour Research, 11(1), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2023.11.1.760

Bingham, A. J. (2023). From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620

Birner, B. J. (2021). Pragmatics: A slim guide. Oxford University Press.

Chanda, A. (2021). Key methods used in qualitative document analysis. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3996213

Chovanec, J. (2021). Saving one's face from unintended humour: Impression management in follow-up sports interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 176, 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.021

Cutting, J., & Fordyce, K. (2021). Pragmatics: A resource book for students (4th ed.). Routledge.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

Jamie, K., & Rathbone, A. P. (2022). Using theory and reflexivity to preserve methodological rigour of data collection in qualitative research. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences, 3(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843211061302

Kentmen, H., Debreli, E., & Yavuz, M. A. (2023). Assessing tertiary Turkish EFL learners’ pragmatic competence regarding speech acts and conversational implicatures. Sustainability, 15(4), 3800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043800

Maraev, V., Breitholtz, E., Howes, C., Larsson, S., & Cooper, R. (2021). Something old, something new, something borrowed, something taboo: Interaction and creativity in humour. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 654615. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654615

McSweeney, B. (2021). Fooling ourselves and others: Confirmation bias and the trustworthiness of qualitative research—Part 1: The threats. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(5), 1063–1075. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2021-0117

Meibauer, J. (2023). On commitment to untruthful implicatures. Intercultural Pragmatics, 20(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-0004

Mende, J. (2022). Extended qualitative content analysis: Researching the United Nations and other international institutions. Qualitative Research Journal, 22(3), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-11-2021-0127

Mensah, E. O., Inyabri, I. T., & Aboh, R. (2023). Sexual jokes in Nigerian stand-up comedy: A multifaceted analytic approach. The European Journal of Humour Research, 11(3), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2023.11.3.791

Messerli, T. C., & Locher, M. A. (2021). Humour support and emotive stance in comments on Korean TV drama. Journal of Pragmatics, 178, 408–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.001

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Mohammed, Z., & Abbas, N. (2024). Universal pragmatic perspective of humor in standup comedy shows. Journal of Education for the Humanities, 4(13.5), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.33899/jeh.2024.183116

Negou, E., Fonkem, M. N., Abenwi, J. S., & Ibrahima. (2023). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 11(9), 1431–1445. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v11i09.sh01

Oka, M., Ishikawa, J., Joboshi, H., Matsumoto, M., Takahashi, S., & Ito, M. (2022). Overview and procedure of thematic analysis focusing on reflexive thematic analysis by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. Journal of Japan Society of Nursing Research, 45(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.15065/jjsnr.20211222158

Olayemi, O. T., & Avoaja, L. (2024). A pragmatic study of selected humorous discourse by Nigerian stand-up comedians. NIU Journal of Humanities, 9(1), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.58709/niujhu.v9i1.1855

Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2022). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287

Peddle, M. (2022). Maintaining reflexivity in qualitative nursing research. Nursing Open, 9(6), 2908–2914. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.999

Pertiwi, W. E., Sudana, D., & Bachari, A. D. (2023). Conversational implicature forms of Banyumasan humorous utterances on YouTube. Journal of Research on English and Language Learning, 4(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v4i1.19314

Rahman, M. S., & Zhou, Z. (2023). The effect of self-related humor on convergent and divergent thinking. The European Journal of Humour Research, 11(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2023.11.4.820

Rawhani, C. (2023). Relational coding: Enhancing the transparency and trustworthiness of grounded theory research. Methodological Innovations, 16(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991221144566

Yule, G. (2023). The study of language (8th ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009233446

Downloads

Published

2026-11-02

Issue

Section

Articles