Normative Evaluation of Timor-Leste’s Maritime Legal Framework under UNCLOS 1982: The 2018 Maritime Boundary Treaty with Australia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59011/vjlaws.5.4.2026.694-704Keywords:
Normative evaluation, Maritime legal framework, Maritime boundary treaty, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS 1982)Abstract
Despite the adoption of bilateral maritime arrangements, the delimitation of maritime boundaries between Timor-Leste and Australia raises continuing legal questions concerning the application of international maritime law. In particular, the extent to which Timor-Leste’s maritime legal framework aligns with the principles and provisions of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) requires further normative assessment. This study examines the principles of UNCLOS 1982 relevant to resolving the maritime boundary dispute between Timor-Leste and Australia and evaluates the implications of assessing Timor-Leste’s maritime legal framework. The research employs a descriptive normative legal method focusing on legal synchronization. The findings indicate that the relevant UNCLOS principles concern the delimitation of maritime zones, including the territorial sea, Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), and continental shelf, as well as dispute settlement mechanisms under Article 287, which provide for peaceful resolution through negotiation, arbitration, or adjudication before the International Court of Justice (ICJ), subject to applicable jurisdictional requirements. The normative evaluation may strengthen Timor-Leste’s bargaining position by identifying alleged inconsistencies between previous maritime agreements and UNCLOS 1982, particularly Article 51 concerning sovereignty and the rights of developing countries. Furthermore, the assessment may support Timor-Leste’s pursuit of international dispute settlement mechanisms, including the ICJ and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), although diplomatic resolution remains the predominant approach.
References
Antsygina, Ekaterina. “Equity in the Delimitation of Continental Shelves.” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 41, no. 2 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-20261021.
Ashshofa, Burhan. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
Bankes, Nigel. “Settling the Maritime Boundaries between Timor-Leste and Australia in the Timor Sea.” The Journal of World Energy Law & Business 11, no. 5 (2018): 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwy021.
Churchill, Robin, Vaughan Lowe, and Amy Sander. The Law of the Sea. 4th ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526159038.
Deng, Niya. “Joint Development between Australia and Timor-Leste.” Chinese Journal of International Law 22, no. 1 (2023): 123–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmad007.
Ekon, Yanto M. P., Alfred G. O. Kase, Melkianus Ndaomanu, and Tontji Christian Rafael. “Legal and Geopolitical Dynamics in the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf Boundaries among Indonesia, Australia, and Timor-Leste in the Timor Sea.” Jurnal Sipakatau: Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat 3, no. 3 (2026): 61–67. https://doi.org/10.66314/sipakatau.v3i3.713.
Farida, Elfia. “Kewajiban Negara Indonesia terhadap Perjanjian Internasional yang Telah Diratifikasi (Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families).” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 3, no. 1 (2020): 182–91. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i1.182-191.
Fernandes, Clinton. Reluctant Saviour: Australia, Indonesia and the Independence of East Timor. Carlton North, VIC: Scribe Publications, 2004.
Gunawan, Y. Hukum Internasional: Sebuah Pendekatan Modern. LP3M UMY, 2021.
Gunawan, Y. “Penegakan Hukum terhadap Pembajakan di Laut melalui Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional.” Jurnal Media Hukum 19, no. 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v19i1.1978.
Hadju, Z. A. A. “Analisis UNCLOS 1982 Terkait Permasalahan Yurisdiksi Negara dan Penegakan Hukum atas Kapal Berbendera Negara Asing.” SASI 27, no. 1 (2021): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.254.
Jaffal, Zeyad. “Corrective Equity in Maritime Delimitation: Legality, Adjustment, and the Three-Stage Method.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 17, no. 3 (2026): idag037. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idag037.
Jing, Ming. “How ‘Unequal Treaties’ Influenced Commission Competence: A New Perspective on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Part XV) in the Timor Sea Conciliation.” Frontiers in Marine Science 11 (2024): 1503259. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1503259.
Kim, Wonhee. “Peaceful Settlement of Maritime Disputes through Compulsory Conciliation under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Focusing on the Timor Sea Conciliation Case.” 법학연구 66, no. 2 (2025): 71–113. https://doi.org/10.35275/pnulaw.2025.66.2.003.
Klein, N. Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566532.001.0001.
Marker, J. East Timor: A Memoir of the Negotiations for Independence. McFarland, 2010.
McRae, Donald. “The Treatment of Relevant Circumstances in Maritime Boundary Delimitation: Adjudication and Conciliation.” In By Peaceful Means: International Adjudication and Arbitration: Essays in Honour of David D. Caron, edited by Charles N. Brower, Joan E. Donoghue, Cian C. Murphy, Cymie R. Payne, and Esmé R. Shirlow, 381–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192848086.003.0020.
Østhagen, Andreas. “Drawing Lines at Sea: Australia’s Five Decades of Maritime Boundary Delimitation.” Australian Year Book of International Law 39 (2022): 233–60.
Papanicolopulu, Irini. “Maritime Boundaries after Delimitation.” Portuguese Yearbook of the Law of the Sea 1, no. 1 (2024): 135–53. https://doi.org/10.1163/29501636-01010008.
Permanent Court of Arbitration. Report and Recommendations of the Compulsory Conciliation Commission between Timor-Leste and Australia on the Timor Sea. PCA Case No. 2016-10. The Hague: Permanent Court of Arbitration, May 9, 2018. https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/132/.
Pereira Coutinho, Francisco, and Francisco Briosa e Gala. “Bounding Down Under: A Tale about the Timor Sea Agreements.” The Texas Journal of Oil, Gas, and Energy Law 19, no. 2 (2024): 189–235.
Purwanti, E. “Relevansi Delimitasi Perbatasan Maritim dengan Faktor Lingkungan.” Balobe Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2021): 76–90. https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v1i2.650.
Rothwell, D. R., and T. Stephens. The International Law of the Sea. 3rd ed. Hart Publishing, 2023.
Situngkir, Danel Aditia. “Terikatnya Negara dalam Perjanjian Internasional.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2018): 167–80. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2018.v2.i2.p167-180.
Sousa da Cunha, Ricardo. “The (Almost) Final Delimitation of the Maritime Border in the Timor Sea.” ULP Law Review / Revista de Direito da UL-P 13, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.60543/ul-plr-rdul-p.v13i1.7167.
Tamada, Dai. “The Timor Sea Conciliation: The Unique Mechanism of Dispute Settlement.” European Journal of International Law 31, no. 1 (2020): 321–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa025.
Utami, Retno Tri, Evi Deliana, and Widia Edorita. “Implikasi Yuridis Perjanjian Perbatasan Maritim Australia dan Timor Leste Tahun 2018 terhadap Batas Wilayah Laut Indonesia dan Australia Tahun 1972.” Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 2 (2019): 1–14.
Zhang, Jianhui, Shaoyang Chen, Pengfei Ning, and Xuefeng Zhang. “An Equidistance/Equiratio Method of Maritime Delimitation on the Earth Ellipsoid.” Journal of Sea Research 191 (2023): Article 102322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2022.102322.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Carolina da Cruz, Francisco Ruas Hornay, Eugenia Brandao da Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
